Mike Carson has dedicated over 35 years designing diving equipment for commercial and military industries.
His main concern is the safety of divers and their equipment working in the offshore industries.
The following paragraphs are quotes taken from OffShoreDiversforum.com. Some are excerpts from longer threads. These are not the words of Mike Carson and belong to the poster signified by their user name. The quotes are posted verbatim and have not been edited, or changed in anyway. These quotes address safety concerns within the commercial diving industry.
"hats off"
"Re: 17B question"
"Re: Superlite"
"Kirby Morgan Mafia?"
"Re: IDIOT"
"Re: Technical Hat Question"
UBA MK 21 MOD 1 HELMET
Books of interest::
Sea Dwellers by Bob Barth & Scott Carpenter
Hard Hat Divers Wear Dresses by Bob Kirby
Cast A Deep Shadow by Gary L. Harris
Illustration taken from the US Diving Manual
Illustration taken from the US Diving Manual
US NAVY DIVING HELMET MK-21 IS BASED ON THE SUPERLITE 17 MODEL
Manufactured since 1976 by the Kirby Morgan Corporation,
this style of helmet has had numerous reports of coming off.
So how did Kirby Morgan fix it by adding a strap to go over the helmet?
I'm glad they don't manufacture for the airline industries. Remember years back, when the doors were falling off some of the airliners? Fix it with a strap!
Sheer genius, huh?
Through the years I have read numerous reports of divers' face plates being blown out resulting in serious injuries and fatalities. In my opinion, this particular problem is mostly related to one fiberglass helmet in particular. I have spoken numerous times about this problem to the manufactuer over the past 30 years. So I am offering this safety tip from my many years of experience as a diver and as helmet manufactuer
Shown in this illustration:
1. Carefully drill out four to six inserts: two on the top and two on the bottom.
2. Fill the holes with epoxy. Drill out the epoxy and then insert a stainless steel screw with a washer and the lock nut on the inside of the helmet. Minimum of four.
KM67
US NAVY KIRBY MORGAN
SWEETHEART DEAL
???
US NAVY
MK-12
Dive Systems
US NAVY MK-21
Dive Helmets
According to the US Navy Dive Manual:
“The MK- V diving helmet was the standard US Navy equipment until succeeded by the MK-12 Surface Supplied Diving System (SSDS) in February 1980. The MK-12 was replaced by the MK-21 in December 1993.” (So according the USN Dive Manual the MK-12 was replaced 13 years and 10 months later by the MK-21.)
“In 1990, the MK-1 MOD 0 was replaced by the MK 21 MOD 1 (Superlite 17B/NS) demand helmet. This is the lightweight rig in use today. In 1985, after an extensive development period, the direct replacement for the MK-V MOD 1 helmet was approved for Fleet use. The new MK-12 mixed Gas Surface-Supplied Diving System (SSDS) was similar to the MK-12 Air SSDS … The MK-12 system was retired in 1992 after the introduction of the MK-21 MOD 1 demand helmet.”
1. It has long been rumored that the USN unofficially began replacing the MK-12 with what would 13 years later be known as the MK-21 SSDS on January 13, 1982 during the recovery operations at the Air Florida Flight 90 crash into the Potomac River. One civilian diver on scene recalls that the military were using KBM-10s, Superlites, and MK-12s.
2. I have heard that after the plane crashed into the icy Potomac River at the 14th St. bridge in Washington, D.C. Dive teams responded from the USCG, US Army and US Navy. As one USN diver entered the water his exhaust valve froze open causing a potentially serious problem. After a quick recovery of the diver, the boat and crew left and did not return until the next day. At which time, all the divers were wearing what appeared to be new Kirby Morgan Superlite-17 helmets. They were also wearing the MK-12 blue coveralls that distinctly have a yellow stripe. This combination is still being used as of this day.
3. The US Navy MK-21 is still manufactured by Kirby Morgan Dive Systems, Inc. No other diving helmet manufacturer has ever been awarded the contract. As far as I know no one else has ever had the opportunity to bid on the contract, since no one else has ever been ANU approved by the Navy. The entire process has been a mystery kept under wrap until, very recently.
This story was told to me over the years by a number of navy personnel. So the way I see it all the taxpayers got for the millions of dollars the Navy spent developing the MK-12 was a pair of coveralls.